Name: Evidentialism at 40. New Arguments, New Angles
Price: 77189.00 CRC
Availability: InStock
Author: Kevin McCain;Scott Stapleford;Matthias Steup
ISBN: 9781032737041

portada Evidentialism at 40. New Arguments, New Angles

Evidentialism at 40. New Arguments, New Angles

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Routledge

Autor

Kevin McCain;Scott Stapleford;Matthias Steup

Colección

Routledge Studies in Epistemology

Año

2025

N° páginas

364

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

Dimensiones

22.90 x 15.20 cm

ISBN13

9781032737041

Evidentialism at 40. New Arguments, New Angles

Kevin Mccain;Scott Stapleford;Matthias Steup (Autor) · Routledge · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 12 a 14 días háb.

₡ 77.189

Costos de importación y 13% IVA incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 12 unidades

₡ 77.189

Llega entre el 01 Sep y el 08 Sep a Costa Rica. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Evidentialism at 40. New Arguments, New Angles"

This volume presents state-of-the-art research on issues related to evidentialism. It demonstrates the continuing relevance of evidentialist epistemology by bringing it into direct confrontation with some of its latest non-evidentialist rivals and by proposing new areas for exploration and development.

Conee and Feldman’s landmark paper “Evidentialism” (1985) served as a launching point for an enormous research program in epistemology. Many epistemologists define their points of view at least partly in terms of how they relate to evidentialism. The chapters in this volume address important questions related to evidentialism, including:

How should ‘evidentialism’ be defined?When does evidence suffice for belief?What does properly or appropriately responding to one’s evidence involve?Does evidentialism capture all cases of epistemically justified believing?Is there any kind of epistemic normativity that falls outside the purview of evidentialist epistemology?Are core evidentialist theses compatible with certain forms of externalism?Do classical evidentialist theses successfully preclude pragmatism?Do moral considerations ever get a say in what it is rational to believe?What (more) should evidentialists say about suspending judgment?What is the connection between evidence and logical inference?What should evidentialists say about extended memory?Does public evidence matter to epistemic justification?

The range of fresh ideas in this cutting-edge volume, marking the 40th anniversary of “Evidentialism”, will appeal to scholars and graduate students working on evidentialism, evidence, the nature of justification, evidential support, and related topics in epistemology.