Envío a todo Costa Rica por solo ₡1490 

Enviar a
Costa Rica
0
  • argentina
  • chile
  • colombia
  • españa
  • méxico
  • perú
  • estados unidos
  • internacional

Selecciona tu país

América

Europa

Resto del mundo

portada The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the bar of Politics (en Inglés)
Formato
Libro Físico
Año
1986
Idioma
Inglés
N° páginas
306
Encuadernación
Tapa Blanda
Peso
1
ISBN
0300032994
ISBN13
9780300032994
N° edición
2

The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the bar of Politics (en Inglés)

Alexander M. Bickel (Autor) · Yale University Press · Tapa Blanda

The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the bar of Politics (en Inglés) - Alexander M. Bickel

Libro Nuevo Importado
Envío: 8 a 10 días háb.
₡ 24.661
Costos de importación y 13% IVA incluídos en el precio ✅
Libro Nuevo

Quedan 9 unidades

₡ 24.661
Llega entre el 06 Nov y el 13 Nov a Costa Rica. Seleccionar ubicación

Reseña del libro "The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the bar of Politics (en Inglés)"

This classic book on the role of the United States Supreme Court traces the history of the Court, assessing the merits of various decisions along the way. Alexander Bickel begins with Marbury v. Madison, which he says give shaky support to judicial review, and concludes with the school desegregation cases of 1954, which he uses to show the extent and limits of the Court’s power. In this way he accomplishes his stated purpose: “to have the Supreme Court’s exercise of judicial review better understood and supported and more sagaciously used.” The book now includes a new foreword by Harry H. Wellington. Alexander Mordecai Bickel (1924-1974) was one of the most influential constitutional commentators of the twentieth century. Bickel’s most distinctive contribution to constitutional law was to stress what he called “the passive virtues” of judicial decision-making – the refusal to decide cases on substantive grounds if narrower grounds exist to decide the case. Bickel viewed “private ordering” and the voluntary working-out of problems as generally preferable to legalistic solutions. In his books Bickel attacked the Warren Court for what he saw as its misuse of history, shoddy reasoning, and sometimes arbitrary results. Bickel thought that the Warren Court’s two most important lines of decision, Brown v. Board of Education and Baker v. Carr, did not produce the results the Court had intended. In his book The Least Dangerous Branch, Bickel coined the term counter-majoritarian difficulty to describe his view that judicial review stands in tension with democratic theory. Bickel envisioned the Supreme Court as playing a statesman-like role in national controversies, engaging in dialogue with the other branches of government. Thus he did not see the Court as a purely passive body, but as one which should lead public opinion, albeit carefully.

Opiniones del libro

Preguntas frecuentes sobre el libro

Todos los libros de nuestro catálogo son Originales.
El libro está escrito en Inglés.
La encuadernación de esta edición es Tapa Blanda.

Preguntas y respuestas sobre el libro

¿Tienes una pregunta sobre el libro? Inicia sesión para poder agregar tu propia pregunta.

Opiniones sobre Buscalibre

Ver más opiniones de clientes